SynZeal product information given on this website is as per the existing understanding while publishing the details on website. The customer is responsible for assessing the accuracy of the information at the time of actual purchase.
SynZeal will update these details as per new development or finding in product specification without further noticed.
化学名称: (R)-2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-(((5-oxo-2,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl)amino)acetic acid
Shipping Temperature: Ambient
HSN Code: 38229010
Country of Origin: India
微笑: O=C(O)[C@@H](C1=CC=C(F)C=C1)NCC2=NC(NN2)=O
Aprepitant Impurity 10 is chemically (R)-2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-(((5-oxo-2,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)methyl)amino)acetic acid. Aprepitant Impurity 10 is supplied with detailed characterization data compliant with regulatory guideline. Aprepitant Impurity 10 can be used for the analytical method development, method validation (AMV), Quality Controlled (QC) application for Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) or during commercial production of Aprepitant.
The product can be used as reference standards and further traceability against pharmacopeial standards (USP or EP) can be provided based on feasibility. SynZeal products are for analytical purpose only and not for human use.
Application of analytical quality by design principles for the determination of alkyl p-toluenesulfonates impurities in Aprepitant by HPLC. Validation using total-error concept
Constantinos K. Zacharis, Elli Vastardi
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Volume 150, 20 February 2018, Pages 152-161
Characterization and Quantitation of Aprepitant Drug Substance Polymorphs by Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
Roy Helmy,* George X. Zhou, Yadan W. Chen, Louis Crocker, Tao Wang, Robert M. Wenslow, Jr., and Anant Vailaya*
Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 605-611
Development and Optimization of Liquid Chromatography Analytical Methods by Using AQbD Principles: Overview and Recent Advances
Tim Tome,†,Nina Ž igart, Zdenko Č asar,, and AlešObreza
Org. Process Res. Dev. 2019, 23, 1784−1802